Re: Pthreads and netio

To: oskit-users@fast.cs.utah.edu
Subject: Re: Pthreads and netio
From: Titus Winters <twinters@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 11:56:02 -0800
In-Reply-To: <20020118111044.A6120@cs.hmc.edu>; from twinters@odin.ac.hmc.edu on Fri, Jan 18, 2002 at 11:10:44AM -0800
Mail-Followup-To: Titus Winters <twinters@odin.ac.hmc.edu>, oskit-users@fast.cs.utah.edu
References: <20020118111044.A6120@cs.hmc.edu>
Sender: owner-oskit-users@fast.cs.utah.edu
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i

Never mind, the issue that brought my question up went away.  I believe
netio to be safe enough with pthreads.  (Of course if I'm wrong I'd love
to hear why.)

-Titus 

On (01/18 11:10), Titus Winters wrote:
> I notice that the documentation on pthreads states that it must be
> used very carefully, and that there is no oskit_wrap_netio to protect
> a netio object.  Does this indicate that using pthreads and low-level
> networking together is probably a bad idea?  
> 
> Thanks
> -Titus Winters

References:

Pthreads and netio

From: Titus Winters <twinters@odin.ac.hmc.edu>